|
|
Post by Joey Eastman on Sept 10, 2008 13:19:35 GMT -6
yes Vigilante is the kid from Windy City who never worked was the ring crew foreman and kept getting his money taken from him and no Lilith if someone dislike them its not because of their "characters" it is because of the INABILITY TO WRESTLE. frost you should never compare a legend like Mick Foley to that of the two fat bloated out of shape no talented duo known as ABSOLUTE ANARCHY. They are an ABSOLUTE ABORTION of what not to look like as a professional wrestler. I mean I have seen some nice looking men and true they are not all defined and ripped but they dont look like these two slobs who obviously can get there fat asses off of a couch but to simply play dress up and pretend they're some thing they're not and here's another example......  I mean are u serious he looks like i did when i first started getting my boobs. His estrogen levels have got to be WAYYYYYYY higher than mine ever will be Amazing |
|
|
|
Post by blazeogw on Sept 10, 2008 13:25:50 GMT -6
Except when Mick Foley started, he wasn't in a fed filled with guys with similar looks. It helped him stand out. Define "similar looks". I don't think anyone in the VWAA looks like one another. If I understand correctly, you're saying Foley's "different look (not having "The Look") HELPED him stand out because he was surrounded by those who did have what was considered "The Look" |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Eastman on Sept 10, 2008 14:23:21 GMT -6
Are you saying that anyone there is as talented as Foley was in his prime? Foley was damn talented and with his "look" he went above and beyond the glass ceiling. Not to mention, what Foley was doing was innovative for its time. This guy was doing things that still hold up to this day. Comparing anyone to guys like Foley, or one of my favorites Cena (gear wise) is unfair to the guys.
Think of a different argument for their look
|
|
|
|
Post by blazeogw on Sept 10, 2008 14:30:28 GMT -6
Are you saying that anyone there is as talented as Foley was in his prime? Foley was damn talented and with his "look" he went above and beyond the glass ceiling. Not to mention, what Foley was doing was innovative for its time. This guy was doing things that still hold up to this day. Comparing anyone to guys like Foley, or one of my favorites Cena (gear wise) is unfair to the guys. Think of a different argument for their look In this sense, the comparison to Foley is an appropriate one IMHO. I'm not standing up for anyone's work. What I'm saying is that comparing based on someone's looks alone is a bad way to go. We can see that by looking at the success the "glass ceiling-breakers" like Foley have had. I'm saying that you should probably watch them work before bagging on them |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Eastman on Sept 10, 2008 14:34:16 GMT -6
So are you saying, that those guys are as good as Foley was in his prime?
|
|
|
|
Post by demonofdamen on Sept 10, 2008 14:39:46 GMT -6
i'm saying i am but thats only because i'm full on myself!
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Eastman on Sept 10, 2008 14:41:01 GMT -6
You're full of me too......in your mouth  I'm sorry, I don't know you, but it was an easy set up. Thank you, I'm here all week |
|
|
|
Post by blazeogw on Sept 10, 2008 14:52:41 GMT -6
Again... "not standing up for anyone's work" just arguing that the comparison to Foley is applicable in the sense that you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. I dislike repeating myself when its already written, but I made a special exception for you Joey because I used to like Lucas.
Not in THAT way... you can't prove anything. Shutup
|
|
|
|
Post by lifeisawork on Sept 10, 2008 15:07:43 GMT -6
I don't think that there would b any man that's named Dymond and besides I got a message that said the dean is a ref that no one really wants to use and wrestlers don't like to be in the ring with and from what I have seen and heard with absolute anarchy they are absolutely horrible A. I know a man that goes by the name of Diamond while on stage. B. You got a message from whom? (A worker? A fan?) regarding working with the Dean. Unless you are a worker I don't think the Deans in ring ability really pertains to you. C. If you dislike Absolute Anarchy, they're doing their job as workers. I disagree with comment C. i always thought B.G. James was a horrible wrestler, i dislike him. i guess one could argue he had mic skills, but he just did nothing for me. Same with Buff Bagwell and Xpac. they annoyed me. I didn't dislike them because they were such huge jerks and they made me want to buy a ticket so they would get their ass kicked. i disliked them because they did nothing for me, they bored me to death. i would change the channel. i wouldn't buy a ticket to see them. like i said, to each his own. So by your definition, if someone thinks A.A. are horrible wrestlers or dislikes them as wrestlers, then A.A. are doing their jobs as heels. i couldn't disagree more. i'm not saying A.A. are bad or good, i'm just talking in general. Rick Rude had true heel heet, the Dudley Boys in ECW had true heel heat. People bought tickets to boo them and hope they got their ass kicked. very few people bought a ticket to see buff bagwell get his ass kicked by lex luger. if A.A. is getting people to boo them and hatet hem so much that the fans want to buy a ticket to the next show so they can see them get their ass kicked, then yes, A.A. is doing their job as heels. if not, well....there you go. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Eastman on Sept 10, 2008 16:37:28 GMT -6
Lucas looked the part |
|
|
|
Post by Doug Simmons on Sept 10, 2008 17:11:22 GMT -6
Lucas looked the part Lucas looked like an Olympic athlete in comparison to some of these clowns. |
|
|
|
Post by shinebox on Sept 10, 2008 22:24:09 GMT -6
Define "similar looks". I don't think anyone in the VWAA looks like one another. Don't take this to heart VWAA wrestlers because I know some of you guys can go and some of the others are learning. However, the guys do look similar. You either have a "fat" guy or you have a scrawny kid. When Mick Foley was working, majority of the guys were big, muscular and tall. |
|
|
|
Post by Lilith on Sept 10, 2008 22:50:02 GMT -6
you have better looking boobs than me and Im a female( 36 C- in case u were wondering). I mean are u serious he looks like i did when i first started getting my boobs. His estrogen levels have got to be WAYYYYYYY higher than mine ever will be Why do you feel the need to bring YOUR breasts into this conversation? Twice in one thread... wow. Get over yourself. Me personally, I would be embarrassed to put my rack in the same category as Freeks, let alone publicly advertise my cup size on a public board. That's just tacky. So by your definition, if someone thinks A.A. are horrible wrestlers or dislikes them as wrestlers, then A.A. are doing their jobs as heels. i couldn't disagree more. i'm not saying A.A. are bad or good, i'm just talking in general. Rick Rude had true heel heet, the Dudley Boys in ECW had true heel heat. People bought tickets to boo them and hope they got their ass kicked. very few people bought a ticket to see buff bagwell get his ass kicked by lex luger. if A.A. is getting people to boo them and hatet hem so much that the fans want to buy a ticket to the next show so they can see them get their ass kicked, then yes, A.A. is doing their job as heels. if not, well....there you go. I based my definition on the information that was given by Skinny. She stated that in her opinion they were horrible workers, yet neglected to back her basis of her opinion. Simply stating a worker sucks with out any explanation as to why they formed that initial opinion leaves it up to the reader to interpret their meaning. Basing an opinion on their physical appearance, and not their in ring performance will always lead to a debate. The Mick Foley posts in this thread are a good example. I'll use a local guy as an example. Jason Dukes, a very talented worker who does not have the physique of other workers in the local scene or the WWe level, yet it is somehow acceptable for him to look the way he does and not get heat for it? Someone please explain why he is above the ideals of how a worker should look? |
|
|
|
Post by frankievaliant on Sept 10, 2008 22:58:40 GMT -6
Fat? My momma didn't raise no fat kid,.. foo. Anyway, like I have said and will continue to say, argue, hate, love, whatever. Its all the same. YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT US. Good or bad, I could care less. You are talking and can't help to continue to do so. Eric Bischoff said in his book, NO PRESS IS BAD PRESS. Controversy sells. We continually pack Midlothian and I can assure you that NO ONE else there sells the place like we do. So, continue with the hate or the lame "spoilers." The fact that you can't help but post negative on our thread simply says we ARE that good.
If we were not, you wouldn't waste your time. Each post proves me right. I laugh at and personally love SkinnyMcGee. Here is a former worker that can't stand us so much that all there is to do is to post anonymously. Really credible. Funny thing is that people always believe they are so smart and that no one knows who they are. It's not at all hard to figure it out, nor is it hard to find out, but alas, my time is better used on such things as getting sponsors, booking our full 2009 schedule, or taking long walks on the beach. And as far as the comments I made at ONC2 last Saturday, perhaps what I said REALLY needs to be listened to before being commented on. It's called a work for a reason. When people shoot, they usually don't use work names or build a story line. Furthermore, claiming bankruptcy wasn't my idea of a way to get sympathetic notice from fans. No, that's another company's lame idea. Everything we do in the VWAA is for a reason, why? We believe in entertainment. Our rise proves our success as does our anti-fans hate.
|
|
|
|
Post by ivanmanson on Sept 11, 2008 16:54:48 GMT -6
That's what I'm talking Frankie !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
